Constant Readers - to borrow an expression from Stephen King - of my blog know that I love lists.
Click here for past posts tagged with that term.
Today, I was perusing some websites that I frequent when I realized that a few of them were sites about lists. Apparently, even the sites I visit are related to lists. That's how much I like lists.
Which brings me to today's topic: A listing of sites that I like that show lists or...
A List of Lists
Ultimate Classic Rock -
Featuring such lists as:
Top 10 Songs of 1977
Top 10 AC/DC Songs (we agree on three of the choices)
Top 100 Classic Rock Songs
11 Points -
featuring such lists as:
11 Studies That Prove Christmas and Science Mix Wonderfully
11 Wonderfully Misspelled Messages of Anger and Bigotry
11 Very Unfortunate Mistakes on TV News Graphics
11 Magazines with Surprisingly High or Low Circulations (and a bonus point for illustrating each magazine with a Sally Field cover)
Marc and Angel Hack Life -
featuring such lists as:
8 Things You Must Give Up To Find Peace
10 Lessons from 10 Quotes that Changed My Life
10 Things Your Friends Wish You Knew
10 Life Lessons People Learn Too Late
Those are the ones for today. I'll have a Part II another day.
Friday, December 28, 2012
Friday, December 21, 2012
Christmas Morning Menu
For the past few years, Carlos and I have hosted Christmas Morning Breakfast - where we eat, drink and exchange presents, before heading off to the get together with our extended family. (This year, we have 36 attending.)
I thought I'd share this year's menu.
I thought I'd share this year's menu.
To Drink:
Coffee
Eggnog
To Eat:
Cinnamon
Toast
Biscuits
I have seen many versions of the Grits and Grillades recipe. The one I have linked is Paula Deen's and is my favorite.
Wednesday, December 19, 2012
Boy Bands
So I was
driving down Airline Drive on my way home from work today, blasting this
song...
One Direction
- What Makes You Beautiful
...when I
came to a stop light. The passenger in the large red truck on my left side gave
me a strange look. I rocked on.
That got me
thinking...
One of my
hobbies is trading shirtless photos of celebrities. I guess it's the modern day,
gay version of baseball cards.
I run three
fairly successful Yahoo groups -
I also frequent and contribute to a message board called
Famous Males Forum. Because it's based in the UK, I find out about many stars
that never cross over to here in the US.
Even though I
have over 100 shirtless photos of, for example, Lee Ryan...
until last week I had
never heard a note of his band Blue. That is, until I started compiling my list
of...
Top Ten Boy Band Songs of All Time
Or at least
that was the original idea of this post. I quickly realized that I liked
looking at the members of the boy bands much more than actually listening to
their music. Even with 89 listed American Boy Bands -- and 58 listed English Boy Bands
- plus the 50+ ones from the rest of the world, this is the best list I could
assemble.
Once I
assemble a Top Ten Boy Band Members for my other blog, I'll post a link here.
Starting off
our countdown is One Direction - What Makes You Beautiful at #7. You saw that video above.
Here's how to
correctly remake a song - with style, humor, and a wink to the original
version...
#6 - Westlife
- Uptown Girl
Bonus points for the best looking member being the one who came out (and the fan base didn't care)...
Here is Billy Joel's original version...
Billy Joel -
Uptown Girl
The
aforementioned boy band Blue has done both a classy remake...
#5 - Blue
featuring Elton John - Sorry Seems To Be The Hardest Word
...and a
fumbled attempt...
Blue
(featuring Kool & the Gang and Lil' Kim) - Get Down On It
Here is Kool
& The Gang's original version...
Kool &
The Gang - Get Down On It
Of the
Disney-Channel-spawned band The Jonas Brothers, this is their best song (though
they actually do have some other good ones)...
#4 - The
Jonas Brothers - Year 3000
The youngest
brother Nick is especially talented. I've heard his solo album
- and it's quite good.
Going back to
1996, I still sneak this song onto mixed CD's that I create...
#3 - Hanson -
MMMBop
Zac Hanson,
the 10-year-old drummer in the video, is now 27 years old, and married with two
kids. Taylor Hanson, the lead singer, is now 29, married with five kids. Don't
you feel old now?
Interestingly,
my top two songs both have the same title..
#2 - The
Jackson 5 - I Want You Back
The top of my
chart of Top Ten Seven Boy Band
Songs of All Time was always going to be this one...
#1 - NSYNC -
I Want You Back
What are your favorite boy band songs?
Labels:
Geeking Out,
Guilty Pleasure,
Lists,
Music,
Radio,
Videos
Friday, December 07, 2012
Gay Marriage Discussion
Here is a Facebook discussion I came
across yesterday afternoon.
My cousin Jonathan:
There is an
issue with same sex marriages in its title. Websters definition of marriage is
the union between a man and woman. Biblical definition of marriage is between a
man and a woman. Hence, same sex union can't be titled/labeld as a marriage.
Just Sayin!!!
His
friend Jason:
Wanna get
married?
His
friend Shawn:
And who
says it can not be labeled as such? Legally that law is called as such and any
argument against it is a waste of time as it was voted into law. And the
biblical term holds no water at all. More than likely if the Supreme Court
tosses out DOMA you could very well see Webster change the defintion.
His friend Jason:
Shawn,
you are what's wrong with this country. What morals? U should then believe and
be fine with the notion that it's ok to marry farm animals. Let's vote on that.
I hate liberal minded idiots.
His
friend Shawn:
And the
backwards, backwoods minded conservative thinking is a dead product and your
point shows it. The whole farm animal/incest argument is rediculous. Look you
can be against same sex marrage personlly but it is civil rights issue that
should neverhave been voted on. If Women'sSuffrage in 1920 and the Civil Rights
Act of 1965 had been brought to a pubic vote it would have not passed in a
large part of the country due to the ignorance and backwards thinking of some
people. But the law passed so the argument is settled.
His friend Rob:
Sorry
Jon, looks like they already changed it: http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/marriage
His
brother Christopher (also my cousin):
Definition of MARRIAGE
1
a (1) : the state of being united to a person of the opposite sex as husband or wife in a consensual and contractual relationship recognized by law (2) : the state of being united to a person of the same sex in a relationship like that of a traditional marriage
Definition of MARRIAGE
1
a (1) : the state of being united to a person of the opposite sex as husband or wife in a consensual and contractual relationship recognized by law (2) : the state of being united to a person of the same sex in a relationship like that of a traditional marriage
His
friend Jason:
The backwards backwoods conservative folk are the ones growing your food and employing you.
The backwards backwoods conservative folk are the ones growing your food and employing you.
His
friend Joe:
Whatever words are used, even gay couples still deserve to celebrate their life long love for each other.
Whatever words are used, even gay couples still deserve to celebrate their life long love for each other.
My
cousin Jonathan:
Not trying to argue against whetherr gays are priviledged to marry or not. Just saying that if you receive a certificate titled 'Marriage certificate' you need to be issued a new one due to incorrect terminology.
Not trying to argue against whetherr gays are priviledged to marry or not. Just saying that if you receive a certificate titled 'Marriage certificate' you need to be issued a new one due to incorrect terminology.
His
friend Rob:
Chris,
most words in the English language have more than one definition and the order
in which they appear doesn't make them more or less accurate. The dictionary
definition argument hardly matters for either side though because dictionaries
are always changing to reflect common usage.
His
friend Joe:
I don't
think Marriage should be part of the government. It was such a pain in the ass
to get the certificate from the county clerk, talk about bureaucratic BS. And I
have to pay them to file that I got married, what a scam.
-------------------------------------------------------------
I didn't want to get into that discussion on
Facebook so emailed Jonathan personally.
Jonathan,
I just saw your post about same sex
marriage. I don't want to get into a discussion about it - here or at your post
- but I wanted to be sure I was clear: You went out of your way to post your
opposition to same sex marriage, fully knowing your words would be read by the
gay and enlightened members of your family? Just Sayin!!!
Or
was your intent to be "funny"?
He responded to me a few hours later.
Actually, I voted in favor of gay marriage here
in Washington with the sole reason of family, you and Christine, in mind. I
absolutely don't see any reason why someone should be bound by any government
entity for sexual orientation, religion, etc... I was only pointing out the
contradiction of the term marriage and it's defining meaning. As stated, I didn't
seek to start any kind of argument. I did not take into account the beliefs of
others and that they would post the things they said. For that I am very sorry.
I am also very sorry for any offense that was taken.
I replied to him this morning.
Thanks for clarifying, Jonathan. I really
appreciate it.
I had heard that some people somehow shoehorned animals into the argument, but until yesterday, I had never actually seen someone mention that point. That is just bizarre. Thankfully, I feel that person will find himself on the wrong side of history. In 10 (50?) years, I feel that the gay marriage debate will seem as quaint as the debate about separate fountains for blacks.
The key rebuttal to his argument is consent. Animals cannot provide consent and bestiality is an avenue where consent cannot be provided in a “loving” relationship. And there are medical reasons why incest is frowned upon. But there is no decent, scientific, medical or moral reason why two loving, consenting, non-related adults should not be afforded the same rights as the majority.
Gays want the same rights as straights. Incest will still be disallowed. Bestiality will still be disallowed. Marriage should be the committed relationship between two persons of consenting age which is lawful in all other ways. The "slippery slope" is all in the minds of these poor people - they are so afraid their way of life is being threatened that they are grasping at whatever straw seems to be waving their way.
As far as using the word “marriage” and not “civil union” or some other substitute: Because separate but equal is not equality, and it is not good enough. "Pretty much" has never been good enough for any minority group, and never will be. Every citizen should be accorded equal treatment under the law as a Constitutional right in the United States of America. That simple. If you want to say that "marriage is just a word," then what's the big deal? The truth is, marriage is far more than "just a word," and that's why it's so important.
His reply to me this afternoon.
I had heard that some people somehow shoehorned animals into the argument, but until yesterday, I had never actually seen someone mention that point. That is just bizarre. Thankfully, I feel that person will find himself on the wrong side of history. In 10 (50?) years, I feel that the gay marriage debate will seem as quaint as the debate about separate fountains for blacks.
The key rebuttal to his argument is consent. Animals cannot provide consent and bestiality is an avenue where consent cannot be provided in a “loving” relationship. And there are medical reasons why incest is frowned upon. But there is no decent, scientific, medical or moral reason why two loving, consenting, non-related adults should not be afforded the same rights as the majority.
Gays want the same rights as straights. Incest will still be disallowed. Bestiality will still be disallowed. Marriage should be the committed relationship between two persons of consenting age which is lawful in all other ways. The "slippery slope" is all in the minds of these poor people - they are so afraid their way of life is being threatened that they are grasping at whatever straw seems to be waving their way.
As far as using the word “marriage” and not “civil union” or some other substitute: Because separate but equal is not equality, and it is not good enough. "Pretty much" has never been good enough for any minority group, and never will be. Every citizen should be accorded equal treatment under the law as a Constitutional right in the United States of America. That simple. If you want to say that "marriage is just a word," then what's the big deal? The truth is, marriage is far more than "just a word," and that's why it's so important.
Full
heartedly agree. With the debacle of same sex marriage for as long as it has
been going on. Down the road, someone will argue the defining meaning to be
either changed or certificates be re-issued with different terminology.
Honestly, the reason I even posted it was because I was reading an article of a
construction crew in Ohio that had to stop work because someone was up in arms
with the 'Men At Work' sign was politically incorrect.
Unfortunately,
tunnelled vision comments were made on my post, setting a negative tone to an
unattended mindset/argument, that I wasn't wanting. As a result, I have taken
the post down. I hope I did not offend Christine either. If so, I would like to
explain.
On
a side note, do you drink wine? and what is your preference? I just have one
more thing to pick up before sending off your gift.
Our
extended family picks names for Christmas. Jonathan happens to have my name
this year. My response is below.
Christine
did not see the post. I asked her. I'll see her this weekend and explain to her
anyway. There's no need to have any misinformation out there.
Sure,
I love wine. Cabernet is my favorite, but any red is fine.
Thanks,
Cuz!
And his final comments...
absolutley.
I'm glad you allowed me to explain. Thanks
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)